Chapter 7 External Activities
Outside of the activities within the department we describe elsewhere, we have participated in and led activities outside the department. Some of them are listed here.
7.1 AMIA 2024 Podium Talk
Adrienne Pichon and Chris Allsman gave a talk at AMIA 2024 titled “A Broad Perspective on Justice-Oriented Research in Biomedical Informatics”. This page reiterates some main points and provides links to references and further reading.
7.1.1 Overview and Activities of the Justice Informatics Collaborative
See other pages on this website for a history of our group and a list of books we have read as part of our efforts. We also highlighted some activities not yet described on this site, including our role as reviewers for the AMIA Inclusive Language and Context Style Guidelines, a workshop we held at AMIA 2022, and subsequent work (in review) synthesizing principles for pursuing justice-oriented research.
We additionally summarized the core values of our group as “humility + bravery + community”.
7.1.2 Significance of Trainee-led, Bottom-Up Work
We suggested that the model demonstrated by our group has unique strengths in promoting justice within biomedical informatics. In particular, it supports: 1) foregrounding trainee expertise and autonomy, 2) working across disciplines and institutions, and 3) aligning academic work with trainee goals and values.
The final point was described in the context of the theory of goal congruity. (Amanda B. Diekman, Joshi, and Benson-Greenwald 2020; Amanda B. Diekman et al. 2010) give an overview of goal congruity, and (Gautam et al. 2024; Lewis et al. 2019; Griffin 2020) discuss how a lack of congruity harms diversity and retention. Similarly, (Clegg 2024) discusses the role of community and (A. N. Washington 2020) discusses the need for cultural competency.
7.1.3 Fostering an Environment for Justice-Oriented Work
For institutions: See (Marrero et al. 2013; Baker 2015) for a discussion of equitable practices for awarding tenure or allocating institutional resources. (McFarling 2021; Ezell 2024; Calvin A. Liang, Munson, and Kientz 2021a) describes how health equity research may be co-opted to further institutional or researcher goals without materially supporting the needs of individuals and communities under study.
For educators and mentors: (Chávez 2012) describes the concept of cultural humility and (Murray, Hinton, and Spencer 2022) discusses how to apply it in academic mentoring. There is a large body of literature on developing culturally responsive, justice-oriented curricula in biomedical and computing disciplines, including (Yadav, Heath, and Hu 2022; Vakil 2018; Ambrose et al. 2014; Lin 2022).
For researchers and trainees: See here for a long list of resources. A few other articles that point to frameworks to incorporate in your research or gaps in how researchers often conceptualize justice in biomedical informatics:
Indigenous Health Equity (Echo-Hawk 2019)
Considering “Respect for Sovereignty” Beyond the Belmont Report and the Common Rule: Ethical and Legal Implications for American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples (Krystal S. Tsosie and Garrison 2021)
Unintended by design: On the political uses of ‘unintended consequences’ (Parvin and Pollock 2020)
Residents for Respectful Research (R3) (“PHAR CVille Residents for Respectful Research”)
A contextual integrity approach to genomic information: what bioethics can learn from big data ethics (Groot 2024)
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics (Bear Don’t Walk et al. 2024)